BAD CALL WITH A WEAK ACE HERE FOR ME

PokerStars Game #14712797838: Tournament #74589335, $15+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2008/01/21 - 03:45:23 (ET)
Table '74589335 1' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ElmiraMike (3535 in chips)
Seat 4: D.E. Million (3630 in chips)
Seat 5: Weir (830 in chips)
Seat 7: ace523 (1380 in chips)
Seat 8: megateaser (4125 in chips)
D.E. Million: posts small blind 100
Weir: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Weir [Ah 7d]
ace523: folds
megateaser: raises 400 to 600
ElmiraMike: folds
D.E. Million: folds
Weir: raises 230 to 830 and is all-in
megateaser: calls 230
*** FLOP *** [Ad 4c 8d]
*** TURN *** [Ad 4c 8d] [Jd]
*** RIVER *** [Ad 4c 8d Jd] [Qc]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Weir: shows [Ah 7d] (a pair of Aces)
megateaser: shows [8c Ac] (two pair, Aces and Eights)
megateaser collected 1760 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 1760 | Rake 0
Board [Ad 4c 8d Jd Qc]
Seat 1: ElmiraMike (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: D.E. Million (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Weir (big blind) showed [Ah 7d] and lost with a pair of Aces
Seat 7: ace523 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: megateaser showed [8c Ac] and won (1760) with two pair, Aces and Eights


CLEARLY FOLDING UNTIL I HAD 3 BLINDS WAS NOT EFFECTIVE, SHOULD'VE WAITED LOGNER.

ON A SIDENOTE: I would like to applaud pokerstars for their subtle, yet effective support of the +1 theory. It may not be a true solution, but it is a step in the right direction.